© Marcel Burkhardt
Pubblicazioni
Kéry, M., Royle, J.A. & H. Schmid (2008)
Importance of sampling design and analysis in animal population studies: a comment on Sergio et al.
Further information
J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 981–986
Contact
Abstract
1. The use of predators as indicators and umbrellas in conservation has
been criticized. In the Trentino region, Sergio et al. (2006; hereafter
SEA) counted almost twice as many bird species in quadrats located in raptor
territories than in controls. However, SEA detected astonishingly few species.
We used contemporary Swiss Breeding Bird Survey data from an adjacent region and
a novel statistical model that corrects for overlooked species to estimate the
expected number of bird species per quadrat in that region.
2. There
are two anomalies in SEA which render their results ambiguous. First, SEA
detected on average only 6 - 8 species, whereas a value of 32 might be expected.
Hence, they probably overlooked almost 80% of all species. Secondly, the
precision of their mean species counts was greater in two-thirds of cases than
in the unlikely case that all quadrats harboured exactly the same number of
equally detectable species. This suggests that they detected consistently only a
biased, unrepresentative subset of species.
3. Conceptually, expected
species counts are the product of true species number and species detectability
p. Plenty of factors may affect p , including date, hour,
observer, previous knowledge of a site and mobbing behaviour of passerines in
the presence of predators. Such differences in p between raptor and
control quadrats could have easily created the observed effects. Without a
method that corrects for such biases, or without quantitative evidence that
species detectability was indeed similar between raptor and control quadrats,
the meaning of SEA´s counts is hard to evaluate. Therefore, the evidence
presented by SEA in favour of raptors as indicator species for enhanced levels
of biodiversity remains inconclusive.
4. Synthesis and
application. Ecologists should pay greater attention to sampling design and
analysis in animal population estimation. Species richness estimation means
sampling a community. Samples should be representative for the community studied
and the sampling fraction among communities compared should be the same on
average, otherwise formal estimation approaches must be applied to avoid
misleading inference.
Keywords: biodiversity, detectability,
indicator species, raptors, sampling, species richness, umbrella species