Birds of arable land caught in a downward spiral


Older wildflower strips with a variety of structures such as shrubs, brambles and dry stems from the previous year offer cover and perches for many bird species. © Jérôme Duplain

In the past century, birds that breed on arable land have severely declined. The downward spiral continues despite federal programmes to protect biodiversity in agricultural areas, indicating that measures urgently need to be adjusted. Several successful projects point the way.

Arable fields account for one quarter of the total area of farmland and provide important habitats for breeding birds. Eight species are considered typical of this habitat in Switzerland: Grey Partridge, Common Quail, Northern Lapwing, Eurasian Skylark, Western Yellow Wagtail, Common Stonechat, Common Whitethroat and Corn Bunting. They all breed on arable land, building their nests among the crops or in adjacent areas of uncultivated land such as fallow land or neglected slopes. While several other species can also be observed on arable land, they generally nest in different habitats.

An alarming situation

In the second half of the 20th century, the populations of birds on arable land collapsed across Europe, and Switzerland was no exception. The characteristic species still present today are concentrated in the vast fields of the western Plateau, the Ajoie JU and the Klettgau SH, although certain species, Eurasian Skylark and Common Quail in particular, also occupy meadows and pastures in the Jura and the Alps.

Since 1993–1996, the situation has continued to worsen for these eight species, as the distribution change maps illustrate, especially in the central and eastern parts of the Plateau, in the Pre-Alps and in the plains of the large Alpine valleys. Several regional surveys confirm this trend; the Common Stonechat is the only positive exception to the general pattern.

Distribution change since 1993–1996 of typical birds of arable land. The map combines the distribution change maps of all eight species.

Positive trends, associated with local conservation projects for farmland birds and their habitats, are apparent in very few areas, some examples being the Champagne genevoise, Grosses Moos BE/FR and the Klettgau.

Distribution in 2013–2016 of typical birds of arable land. The map combines all records per kilometre square of the following eight species: Grey Partridge, Common Quail, Northern Lapwing, Eurasian Skylark, Western Yellow Wagtail, Common Stonechat, Common Whitethroat and Corn Bunting.

Arable land under pressure

All birds of arable land are heavily dependent on agriculture in the plains and its methods of cultivation. Exploitation is generally intensive, subject to processes of rationalisation and industrialisation and the widespread use of pesticides. More environmentally friendly forms of production such as organic farming or low-intensity cereal production (labelled «extenso» in Switzerland) are only applied on 20 % of lowland arable land, which has in turn lost 210 km2 of its area since 1997 (–5 %), largely to building development.

To compensate for the negative impact of intensive production on biodiversity, the federal government supports the designation of biodiversity promotion areas (BPA) and has published a list of target species in farmland. Among the five different types of BPA in arable land, wildflower strips, rotational fallows and field margins are particularly effective in the conservation of several target species and are considered high-quality habitats. Birds benefit enormously from wildflower strips, especially older strips that offer a rich variety of structures. At present, however, high-quality BPA only account for 0.8 % of arable land. That is an extremely small figure compared to 8 % of high-quality BPA in meadows and pastures. It goes without saying that high-quality BPA are much too rare in arable land to stop the decline of birds in this habitat.

Achievable objectives

Birds of arable land desperately need more suitable habitat. The successful projects near Geneva, in the Grosses Moos and in the Klettgau demonstrate that at least 3 % of area in arable land must be set aside for high-quality BPA, mainly in the form of wildflower strips and field margins. This would mean tripling the current area of BPA. At the landscape level, including the surrounding area that is not cultivated, at least 10–14 % of high-quality habitat is required to effectively promote threatened farmland species. The successful projects demonstrate that these objectives are both achievable and profitable for farmers. Such projects urgently need to receive federal support. At the same time, low-intensity farming practices need to be developed.

The fate of field birds and biodiversity in arable land is directly dependent on our agricultural policy decisions. We need to make sure these decisions are focussed on reconciling agricultural productivity with the protection of biodiversity.

keine Übersetzung benötigt: Jérôme Duplain

Recommended citation of the Atlas online:
Knaus, P., S. Antoniazza, S. Wechsler, J. Guélat, M. Kéry, N. Strebel & T. Sattler (2018): Swiss Breeding Bird Atlas 2013–2016. Distribution and population trends of birds in Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach.


BAFU & BLW (2008): Umweltziele Landwirtschaft. Hergeleitet aus bestehenden rechtlichen Grundlagen. Umwelt-Wissen Nr. 0820. Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU) und Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft (BLW), Bern.

Birrer, S., P. Mosimann-Kampe, M. Nuber, S. Strebel & N. Zbinden (2013): Ökologischer Ausgleich und Brutvögel - das Beispiel Grosses Moos 1997-2009. Ornithol. Beob. 110: 475–494.

Birrer, S., P. Mosimann-Kampe & S. Strebel (2018): Brutvogelmonitoring Grosses Moos. Bericht 2017. Schweizerische Vogelwarte, Sempach.

BLW (2017): Agrarbericht 2017. Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft (BLW), Bern.

Bundesamt für Statistik (2015): Die Bodennutzung in der Schweiz. Auswertungen und Analysen. Statistik der Schweiz, Fachbereich 2, Raum und Umwelt 002-0905. Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS), Neuchâtel.

Chevillat, V., S. Stöckli, S. Birrer, M. Jenny, R. Graf, L. Pfiffner & J. Zellweger-Fischer (2017a): Mehr und qualitativ wertvollere Biodiversitätsförderflächen dank Beratung. Agrarforsch. Schweiz 8: 232–239.

Chevillat, V., S. Stöckli, S. Birrer, M. Jenny, R. Graf, L. Pfiffner & J. Zellweger-Fischer (2017b): Surfaces de promotion de la biodiversité: amélioration quantitative et qualitative par le conseil. Rech. Agron. Suisse 8: 232–239.

Christen, W. (2017): Bestandsentwicklung von zehn Brutvogelarten in der Aareebene bei Solothurn von 1982 bis 2016. Ornithol. Beob. 114: 25–40.

de Baan, L., S. Spycher & O. Daniel (2015a): Einsatz von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Schweiz von 2009 bis 2012. Agrarforsch. Schweiz 6: 48–55.

de Baan, L., S. Spycher & O. Daniel (2015b): Utilisation des produits phytosanitaires en Suisse de 2009 à 2012. Rech. Agron. Suisse 6: 48–55.

Guntern, J., T. Lachat, D. Pauli & M. Fischer (2013a): Flächenbedarf für die Erhaltung der Biodiversität und der Ökosystemleistungen in der Schweiz. Kurzfassung. Forum Biodiversität Schweiz der Akademie der Naturwissenschaften SCNAT, Bern.

Guntern, J., T. Lachat, D. Pauli & M. Fischer (2013b): Surface requise pour la sauvegarde de la biodiversité en Suisse. Version courte. Forum Biodiversité Suisse, Académie suisse des sciences naturelles (SCNAT), Berne.

Jenny, M., O. Holzgang & N. Zbinden (2005a): Das Rebhuhn - Symbol für eine artenreiche Kulturlandschaft. Avifauna Report Sempach 4. Schweizerische Vogelwarte, Sempach.

Jenny, M., O. Holzgang & N. Zbinden (2005b): La Perdrix grise - symbole d'un paysage agricole diversifié. Avifauna Report Sempach 4. Station ornithologique suisse, Sempach.

Jenny, M., B. Josephy & B. Lugrin (2003): Ökologische Aufwertungsmassnahmen in Ackerbaugebieten und ihre Auswirkungen auf ausgewählte Brutvogelarten. S. 151–155 in: R. Oppermann & H. U. Gujer (Hrsg.): Artenreiches Grünland, bewerten und fördern: MEKA und ÖQV in der Praxis. Ulmer, Stuttgart.

Jenny, M., J. Zellweger-Fischer, L. Pfiffner, S. Birrer & R. Graf (2011a): Leitfaden für die Anwendung des Punktesystems. Biodiversität auf Landwirtschaftsbetrieben im Projekt "Mit Vielfalt punkten - Bauern beleben die Natur". Schweizerische Vogelwarte, Sempach, und Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau, Frick.

Jenny, M., J. Zellweger-Fischer, L. Pfiffner, S. Birrer & R. Graf (2011b): Manuel d'utilisation du système de points. La biodiversité dans les domaines agricoles, avec le projet "Les paysans marquent des points - la nature gagne en diversité". Station ornithologique suisse, Sempach, et Institut de recherche pour l’agriculture biologique (FiBL), Frick.

Knaus, P., R. Graf, J. Guélat, V. Keller, H. Schmid & N. Zbinden (2011): Historischer Brutvogelatlas. Die Verbreitung der Schweizer Brutvögel seit 1950/Atlas historique des oiseaux nicheurs. La répartition des oiseaux nicheurs de Suisse depuis 1950. Schweizerische Vogelwarte/Station ornithologique suisse, Sempach.

Martinez, N. & S. Birrer (2017): Entwicklung ausgewählter Vogelarten im Landwirtschaftsgebiet des Kantons Basel-Landschaft. Ornithol. Beob. 114: 161–178.

Meichtry-Stier, K. S., J. Duplain, M. Lanz, B. Lugrin & S. Birrer (in Vorb.): The importance of size, location and vegetation composition of perennial fallows for farmland birds.

Meichtry-Stier, K. S., M. Jenny, J. Zellweger-Fischer & S. Birrer (2014): Impact of landscape improvement by agri-environment scheme options on densities of characteristic farmland bird species and brown hare (Lepus europaeus). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 189: 101–109.

Meichtry-Stier, K. S., F. Korner-Nievergelt, U. Kormann, M. Spiess, P. Mosimann-Kampe, S. Strebel, J.-L. Zollinger & R. Spaar (2013): Habitatwahl der Dorngrasmücke Sylvia communis in der Westschweiz: Folgerungen für die Artenförderung. Ornithol. Beob. 110: 1–15.

OFAG (2017): Rapport agricole 2017. Office fédéral de l’agriculture (OFAG), Berne.

OFEV & OFAG (2008): Objectifs environnementaux pour l’agriculture. A partir de bases légales existantes. Connaissance de l'environnement n° 0820. Office fédéral de l’environnement (OFEV) et Office fédéral de l’agriculture (OFAG), Berne.

Office fédéral de la statistique (2015): L’utilisation du sol en Suisse. Exploitation et analyse. Statistique de la Suisse, domaine 2, Espace et environnement 002-0906. Office fédéral de la statistique (OFS), Neuchâtel.

Rudin, M., P. Horch, I. Hugentobler, U. Weber & S. Birrer (2010): Bestandsentwicklung von Brutvögeln im ökologisch aufgewerteten St. Galler Rheintal. Ornithol.Beob. 107: 81–100.

UFAG (2017): Rapporto agricolo 2017. Ufficio federale dell'agricoltura (UFAG), Berna.

Walter, T., S. Eggenberg, Y. Gonseth, F. Fivaz, C. Hedinger, G. Hofer, A. Klieber-Kühne, N. Richner, K. Schneider, E. Szerencsits & S. Wolf (2013a): Operationalisierung der Umweltziele Landwirtschaft. Bereich Ziel- und Leitarten, Lebensräume (OPAL). ART-Schriftenreihe 18. Forschungsanstalt Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon ART, Tänikon.

Walter, T., S. Eggenberg, Y. Gonseth, F. Fivaz, C. Hedinger, G. Hofer, A. Klieber-Kühne, N. Richner, K. Schneider, E. Szerencsits & S. Wolf (2013b): Opérationnalisation des objectifs environnementaux pour l’agriculture. Domaine espèces cibles et caractéristiques, milieux naturels (OPAL). ART-Schriftenreihe 18. Agroscope, Tänikon.

Weggler, M. & Y. Schwarzenbach (2011): Zusammenhänge zwischen der Bestandsentwicklung der Brutvögel 1988-2008 und der Quantität und Qualität der Ökoflächen im Landwirtschaftsgebiet im Kanton Zürich. Ornithol. Beob. 108: 323–344.

Zollinger, J.-L. (2012): Oiseaux nicheurs de jachères florales. Nos Oiseaux 59: 123–142.

Zollinger, J.-L., S. Birrer, N. Zbinden & F. Korner-Nievergelt (2013): The optimal age of sown field margins for breeding farmland birds. Ibis 155: 779–791.


Species concerned
Farming area
Land management & land use
Species in decline
Atlas bestellen