The spread of settlements has consequences for farmland birds

89 % of new settlement areas were built on farmland, predominantly on meadows (32.8 %) and arable land (31.5 %). Orchards, vineyards and gardens (13.5 %) were also used. Woodland was less affected in comparison (9.1 %), one reason being that forests benefit from better legal protection than farmland.

The growth of settlements goes hand in hand with the fragmentation of landscapes. The vast agricultural landscapes of the past are now interspersed with roads, buildings and industrial complexes, but also livestock-fattening units, greenhouses and covered crops, and have lost their open character. The spread of settlements accelerated between 1960 and 1980, before slowing down again between then and 2002. From 2002 to 2010, the annual increase in urban expansion accelerated again, reaching three times the rate of 1980–2002. At the same time, cultivation of the remaining farmland has intensified. The practice of covering crops with plastic sheeting has also increased, and many dirt roads have been paved. Habitat loss is aggravated by disturbance, caused in particular by the increased presence of humans and a range of leisure activities that claim more and more space. All in all, these changes predominantly affect farmland birds.

Many ecologically valuable habitats in the transition zones between settlements and farmland (e.g. orchard belts) have been lost to building development, leading to the decline of birds with a preference for this type of habitat (e.g. Eurasian Wryneck, Common Redstart, Spotted Flycatcher).

A spatial-planning strategy that counteracts fragmentation is greater building density. However, densification puts remaining semi-natural green spaces within settlements at risk, such as trees or old gardens. Nowadays, 60 % of surfaces in settlements are impervious, which is another reason why species richness (e.g. of vascular plants) in settlements has continued to decrease in the last ten years. Nevertheless, species richness (e.g. birds, vascular plants and mosses) is often higher in settlements than in the adjacent farmland. Still, in Switzerland as a whole, the dominant process of urbanisation is resulting in the homogenisation of biodiversity.

Landscape change often happens gradually and locally. The effects on bird communities are serious, but not always evident based on the data from the kilometre squares (1 × 1 km) surveyed for the 1993–1996 and 2013–2016 atlases. Many agricultural areas were already farmed so intensively 20 years ago that several species were only found in low densities in large parts of the Central Plateau (e.g. Common Cuckoo, Eurasian Skylark, Common Redstart) or had disappeared completely (e.g. Grey Partridge, Whinchat). A general comparison of survey results from 1993–1996 and 2013–2016 therefore fails to reflect the seriousness of the situation. The following example helps to illustrate the development.

The two municipalities Corcelles-près-Payerne VD and Payerne VD have expanded considerably over the past 20 years and have now practically grown together. The population of the two towns increased by 39 % and 28 %, respectively, between 1995 and 2015. In the surveyed kilometre square, a new residential area was built during this time period and many old trees, copses and hedges were lost. Between 1995 and 2015, several bird species that occupy such transitional habitats declined steeply or disappeared completely. Within 20 years, the overall number of species dropped from 48 to 31. Only three new species were recorded: Black Kite, Common Kestrel and Great Spotted Woodpecker.

The substantial loss of species can be explained by the disappearance of undeveloped space, but also by the intensified use of the remaining land (e.g. larger plots, fewer field margins). As a result, open areas consist almost exclusively of intensively managed farmland for forage crops and a few tall hedges. In addition, gardens in new housing developments are young and offer few near-natural structures, only attracting species with simple habitat requirements.

Agricultural and natural landscapes urgently need to be protected and their ecological value restored, and they must at least partly remain untouched by human use. For some time now, there have been attempts to slow the expansion of settlements and prevent fragmentation by means of spatial-planning legislation, cantonal structure plans, and building and zoning codes. Municipalities have a particularly important responsibility in this respect.

Open spaces and areas of high ecological value in particular should be preserved in settlements, or replaced if they are used for construction. Useful measures include compiling an inventory of objects to be preserved, a practice that some municipalities have already adopted. Special attention should be given to construction outside of building zones, where building continues despite legal regulations that prohibit it.

BAFU (2017): Biodiversität in der Schweiz: Zustand und Entwicklung. Ergebnisse des Überwachungssystems im Bereich Biodiversität, Stand 2016. Umwelt-Zustand Nr. 1630. Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU), Bern.

Bundesamt für Statistik (2013): Die Bodennutzung in der Schweiz. Resultate der Arealstatistik. Statistik der Schweiz, Fachbereich 2, Raum und Umwelt 002-0901. Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS), Neuchâtel.

Bundesamt für Statistik (2018): STAT-TAB – Interaktive Tabellen. URL https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/dienstleistungen/forschung/stat-tab-online-datenrecherche.html, 20.4.2018.

Ewald, K. C. & G. Klaus (2009): Die ausgewechselte Landschaft. Vom Umgang der Schweiz mit ihrer wichtigsten natürlichen Ressource. Haupt, Bern.

FOEN (2017): Biodiversity in Switzerland: status and trends. Results of the biodiversity monitoring system in 2016. State of the environment no. 1630. Federal Office for the Environment FOEN, Bern.

Knop, E. (2016): Biotic homogenization of three insect groups due to urbanization. Glob. Chang. Biol. 22: 228–236.

OFEV (2017): Biodiversité en Suisse: état et évolution. Synthèse des résultats de la surveillance de la biodiversité. État: 2016. État de l’environnement n° 1630. Office fédéral de l’environnement OFEV, Berne.

Office fédéral de la statistique (2013): L’utilisation du sol en Suisse. Résultats de la statistique de la superficie. Statistique de la Suisse, domaine 2, Espace et environnement 002-0902. Office fédéral de la statistique (OFS), Neuchâtel.

Office fédéral de la statistique (2018): STAT-TAB – Tableaux interactifs. URL https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/services/recherche/stat-tab-donnees-interactives.html, 20.4.2018.

Rey, L., M. Hunziker, M. Stremlow, D. Arn, G. Rudaz & F. Kienast (2017a): Mutation du paysage: résultats du programme de monitoring Observation du paysage suisse (OPS). État de l’environnement n° 1641. Office fédéral de l’environnement OFEV, Berne, Institut fédéral de recherches sur la forêt, la neige et le paysage WSL, Birmensdorf, Berne.

Rey, L., M. Hunziker, M. Stremlow, D. Arn, G. Rudaz & F. Kienast (2017b): Wandel der Landschaft: Erkenntnisse aus dem Monitoringprogramm Landschaftsbeobachtung Schweiz (LABES). Umwelt-Zustand Nr. 1641. Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU, Bern, und Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft WSL, Birmensdorf, Bern.

Schwick, C., J. Jaeger & F. Kienast (2011a): Mesurer et éviter l’étalement urbain. Notice pour le praticien 47. Institut fédéral de recherches WSL, Birmensdorf.

Schwick, C., J. Jaeger & F. Kienast (2011b): Zersiedelung messen und vermeiden. Merkblatt für die Praxis 47. Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL, Birmensdorf.

Schwick, C., J. A. G. Jaeger, A. Hersperger & F. Kienast (2013): Stark beschleunigte Zunahme der Zersiedelung in der Schweiz. Geomatik Schweiz/Géomatique Suisse 111: 48–53.

Swiss Federal Statistical Office (2013): Land use in Switzerland. Results of the Swiss land use statistics. Swiss Statistics, domain 2, Territory and Environment 002-0904. Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO), Neuchâtel.

UFAM (2017): Biodiversità in Svizzera: stato ed evoluzione. Risultati del sistema di monitoraggio della biodiversità, stato 2016. Stato dell’ambiente n. 1630. Ufficio federale dell’ambiente UFAM, Berna.

Ufficio federale di statistica (2013): L’utilizzazione del suolo in Svizzera. Risultati della statistica della superficie. Statistica della Svizzera, settore 2, Territorio e ambiente 002-0903. Ufficio federale di statistica (UST), Neuchâtel.

Ufficio federale di statistica (2018): STAT-TAB – Tabelle interattive. URL https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/it/home/servizi/ricerca/stat-tab-ricerca-dati-online.html, 20.4.2018.